Administrative Work of the Soviet Government in the Fergana Valley
Keywords:
Turkestan ASSR, soviet, , economical soviet, oblastAbstract
The article evaluates the administrative reforms the Soviet government conducted within the Fergana Valley throughout its period of governance. The article concentrates on two transformative Soviet administrative reforms which included district reorganization together with establishing new territorial borders in Soviet rule's early phase. The research shows that decisions were rushed through by unable officials who overlooked residential needs leading to multiple social upheavals. The research reveals that one crucial knowledge gap exists regarding the insufficient planning in administrative restructuring because it steadily fueled interethnic conflicts and regional disputes. Historical documents together with data became a foundation for this study as the researcher examined documents from the 1920s region restructuring process alongside conflicts which occurred between Uzbek and Kyrgyz official groups. Local resistance against these reforms grew substantial because they neglected to understand regional economic and social conditions leading the population to maintain enduring protests. The research establishes that administrative choices together with wrong territorial management have created enduring conflicts which maintain themselves until the current period. This research shows vital implications because it demonstrates why local community conditions matter when institutions plan political and administrative reforms. Long-term assessments of these historical administrative choices in Central Asia need more investigation to analyze their effects on ethnic relations in the region and to learn appropriate lessons for current governance approaches.
References
D. Krasnovskogo, Ed., Materialy po rayonirovaniyu Turkestana. Vypusk 2. Proyekt administrativno-khozyaystvennogo deleniya TSSR. Tashkent: Izd. TES, 1924.
“ŬzRMDA, 86-fond, 1-rŭykhat, 7314-yiġmazhild, 73-varak’.”
“ŬzRMDA, 86-fond, 1-rŭykhat, 7314-yiġmazhild, 68-varak’.”
“Ŭzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti Administratsiyasi arkhivi Farġona viloyat bŭlimi.”
T. Shodiev B. Turayey and K. Shodiyev, “ICT and economic growth nexus: Case of Central Asian countries,” Procedia Soc. Sci., 2021.
K. Sŭzi, “Khalk’ Sŭzi. 2017 yil 4 avgust.” 2017.
T. B. Sobirovich, “The Strategy of Cultural Development in Central Asia During Amir Temur and the Temurids Dynasty,” Int J Sci Res Multidiscip. Stud., 2021.
M. Skalamera, “Russia’s lasting influence in Central Asia,” Survival, 2023, doi: 10.4324/9781003422228-9.
K. Sehring and J. Abdullaev, “Unequal distribution: Academic knowledge production on water governance in Central Asia,” Water Secur., 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.watsec.2020.100052.
R. Pomfret, “Central Asian economies: Thirty years after dissolution of the Soviet Union,” Comp. Econ. Stud., 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41294-021-00166-z.
M. Hartvigsen and M. Gorgan, “FAO experiences with land market development and land management instruments in Eastern Europe and Central Asia,” J Agric Envtl L, 2020, doi: 10.17159/jael.
P. M. Carley, “The legacy of the Soviet political system and the prospects for developing civil society in Central Asia,” in The International Politics of Eurasia, 2024. doi: 10.4324/9781003578734-14.
AZ. Isiksal AF. Assi and A. Zhakanov, “Natural resources, human capital, and CO2 emissions: Missing evidence from the Central Asian States,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21227-5.
U. Andrusiv and L. Simkiv, “Knowledge economy: trends in the world and analysis of Ukraine,” J. East. Eur. Cent. Asian Res., 2020.
Z. Dong, G. Huitsing, and R. Veenstra, “Positive and negative leadership in late childhood: Similarities in individual but differences in interpersonal characteristics,” Cent. Asian Res. J. Interdiscip. Stud. CARJIS, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 206–213, 2023, doi: 10.24412/2181-2454-2023-1-206-213.