Management Strategies that Affecting Teaching Quality Management and Students’ Learning Outcome in Higher Vocational Colleges
Keywords:
teaching quality management, student learning outcomes, educational resources, teacher professional development, curriculum management, continuous quality improvementAbstract
This paper aims to examine management strategies that influence online course learning outcomes in the context of digital education, and the links between educational resources and teacher management and student learning outcomes. High quality talents come from the high efficiency teaching management and sufficient educational resources of the school, and high quality talents depend on the school educational resources to a large extent. Educational resources in higher vocational colleges are one of the important factors that affect students' learning outcomes. A variety of management strategies from different perspectives have an impact on teaching quality, and then affect students' learning outcomes, which requires university administrators to plan and allocate educational resources. Through public interviews with five experts from "double high" demonstration higher vocational colleges in Guangdong Province, China, two conclusions are drawn: First, it can be concluded that university leaders mainly manage learning outcomes through educational resources, teacher professional development, curriculum management and continuous quality improvement. Then, attempts are made to highlight the significant relationship between educational resources and student learning outcomes. This study will help university leaders and principals realize the importance of teaching quality management and identify the factors that improve the quality of school education and thus affect student learning outcomes.
References
Abd Rahman, F., Scaife, J., Yahya, N. A., & Ab Jalil, H. (2010). Knowledge of diverse learners: Implications for the practice of teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 3(2).
Ally, M. (2019). Competency profile of the digital and online teacher in future education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2).
Amon, L., & Bustami, M. R. (2021). Implementation of School-Based Management in Curriculum and Learning Processes: a Literatur Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah (Dikdasmen), 1-11.
Ayeni, A. J., & Akinfolari, C. A. (2014). Assessing Principals’ Coordinating and Controlling Strategies for Effective Teaching and Quality Learning Outcome in Secondary Schools in Ondo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 7(1).
Bernhardt, V. L. (2017). Data analysis for continuous school improvement. Routledge.
Chance, B., & Peck, R. (2015). From curriculum guidelines to learning outcomes: Assessment at the program level. The American Statistician, 69(4), 409-416.
Clark, D. (1993). Teacher Evaluation: A Review of the Literature with Implications for Educators.
Dahri, N. A., Vighio, M. S., Bather, J. D., & Arain, A. A. (2021). Factors influencing the acceptance of mobile collaborative learning for the continuous professional development of teachers. Sustainability, 13(23), 13222.
Dai, D. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence technology assisted music teaching design. Scientific programming, 2021, 1-10.
Dimmock, C. (2013). School-based management and linkage with the curriculum. In School-based management and school effectiveness (pp. 1-21). Routledge.
Dorgu, T. E. (2015). Different teaching methods: A panacea for effective curriculum implementation in the classroom. International journal of secondary education, 3(6), 77-87.
Glasman, N., Cibulka, J., & Ashby, D. (2002). Program self-evaluation for continuous improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 257-288.
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493.
Grissmer, D. (2013). Research directions for understanding the relationship of educational resources to educational outcomes. Education Finance in the New Millenium, 139-156.
Harper, B. J., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Tightening curricular connections: CQI and effective curriculum planning. Research in Higher Education, 51, 505-527.
King, K. G., & Herrmann, J. W. (2015). Learning outcomes for a multidisciplinary undergraduate honors program: development, measurement, and continuous improvement. Quality Approaches in Higher Education, 6(1), 4.
Li Min. (2020). Realization path of "Professionalization" in curriculum development and curriculum management of high-level professional groups. Vocational Education Forum.
Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564.
Liu Zhifeng. (2016). Diagnosis and reform of internal quality assurance system in higher vocational colleges: essence, significance and content. Vocational and Technical Education, 18.
Namoun, A., Taleb, A., Al-Shargabi, M., & Benaida, M. (2019). A learning outcome inspired survey instrument for assessing the quality of continuous improvement cycle. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 15(2), 108-129.
Ni’mah, A. T., Solihin, F., & Sari, I. U. (2024). Blended learning implementation of outcome-based education curriculum in learning management systems. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 499, p. 01020). EDP Sciences.
Pak, K., Desimone, L. M., & Parsons, A. (2020). An Integrative Approach to Professional Development to Support College-and Career-Readiness Standards. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(111), n111.
Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2016). Professional development for quality teaching and learning: A focus on student learning outcomes. In Handbook of research on professional development for quality teaching and learning (pp. 652-677). IGI Global.
Premalatha, K. (2019). Course and program outcomes assessment methods in outcome-based education: A review. Journal of Education, 199(3), 111-127.
Sabrina, E., Giatman, M., & Ernawati, E. (2022). Development of curriculum management in the world of education. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(10), 4691-4696.
Takriff, M. S., Abdullah, S. R. S., Mohammad, A. B., & Anuar, N. (2011, April). Students' feedback in the continuous quality improvement cycle of engineering education. In 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 374-377). IEEE.
Ummat, L. S., & Retnowati, E. (2022). The Influence of Social Capital, Intrinsic Motivation, Self-Esteem on Student Learning Outcomes. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1(3), 25-30.
Wynter, L., Burgess, A., Kalman, E., Heron, J. E., & Bleasel, J. (2019). Medical students: what educational resources are they using?. BMC medical education, 19, 1-8.
Yue J J. (2012). Research on Educational Resource Sharing in Higher Education Institutions (Doctoral dissertation, Liaoning Normal University).
Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and financial management, 13(3), 55.
Zhong, X., Wu, X., Xie, X., Zhou, Q., Xu, R., Wang, J., ... & Qiu, X. (2023). A descriptive study on clinical department managers’ cognition of the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle and factors influencing their cognition. BMC medical education, 23(1), 294.
Zhuo Ni. (2019). Master's thesis on Student Development Diagnosis and Improvement in Higher Vocational Colleges (Central South University for Nationalities).
Карінцева, О., Євдокимов, А., Євдокимова, А., Харченко, М., & Дронь, В. (2020). Designing the information educational environment of the studying course for the educational process management using cloud services. Mechanism of an economic regulation, (3 (89)), 87-97.
