Features of Scientific Work and Ethics of Scientific Research
Keywords:
Scientific research, research ethics, cognitiveAbstract
The article focuses on defining scientific work elements and research ethics to explain how these aspects drive knowledge progress while advancing social development. Scientific work stands apart from other activities because it combines three distinct goals: discovering fresh knowledge while interpreting its worth and developing predictions of future events. Scientists need to establish well-defined research methods as well as moral guidelines throughout their practices so their results remain innovative yet contribute positively to public welfare. The paper examines scientific processes through extensive research that investigates how research structures work together with scientific ethical standards as well as interdisciplinary communication practices. Scientists can find innovation in their work but they need structured plans with strict protocols and extended teamwork for their research to succeed. Researchers should employ abstracts reports and journal articles as dissemination tools to make their research findings accessible to audiences according to the article. Research credibility requires ethical practices to uphold both objectivity and transparency to allow proper scientific work application. Funding research with better ethical standards and methods leads to improved scientific output which specifically strengthens sustainable academic-industrial practices. The research focuses on demonstrating how research ethics stand essential for scientific advancement. This abstract presents an abridged summary which includes sections about the introduction as well as knowledge gap identification and methodological approach, findings, results, and application implications.
References
N. I. Zakirovich and S. I. Mahammadovna, “Levels of development of human abilities,” Nov. Obraz. Issled. V XXI Veke Educ. News Res. 21st Century, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 341–344, 2023.
P. Winch and M. Campbell, Ethics and action. Taylor & Francis, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9781003051138.
I. M. Sirojiddinova, “GENERAL SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES OF PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCH,” Web Teach. Inderscience Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 368–372, 2025.
I. M. Sirojiddinova, “Scientific and Technological Progress, Problems and Solutions In the Application of Artificial Intelligence,” Am. J. Lang. Lit. Learn. STEM Educ. 2993-2769, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 49–53, 2023.
N. Shermuxamedova, Ilmiy tadqiqot metodologiyasi. Fan va texnologiya, 2014.
D. Shaw, R. Lorusso, and M. M. Suverein, “Ethics of ECPR research,” Resuscitation, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.06.030.
L. Qurbonova, Ijodiy tafakkur. T. Universitet, 2010.
M. Nazarov, Ilmiy tadqiqot metodologiyasi. Andijon, 2024.
J. Morley, C. C. V. Machado, C. Burr, J. Cowls, and I. Joshi, “The ethics of AI in health care: a mapping review,” Soc. Sci. Med., 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113686.
S. I. Mahammadovna, “Features of Cluster Design in Modern Paradigms of Education,” Telematique, vol. 22, no. 01, pp. 348–355, 2023.
S. I. Mahammadovna, “Needs and factors for developing professional and creative abilities of students of higher educational institutions,” Ann. Romanian Soc. Cell Biol., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2200–2209, 2021.
S. Iroda, “INTEGRATED PROJECT MODEL FOR PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEERS,” Curr. Res. J. Pedagog., vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 96–100, 2024.
A. N. Farobiy, Fozil kishilar shaxri. Toshkent, 2016.
J. Dewey and J. H. Tufts, Ethics. Gutenberg.org, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_105.
E. Bietti, “From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM Digital Library, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3351095.3372860.
