The Relationship between Intelect and Creativity
Keywords:
Intelligence, creativity, divergent thinking, development of creativityAbstract
The paper establishes a connection between intellect and creativity while focusing on their impact on human success together with personal development. The acquisition of knowledge and flexible problem-solving and adaptive skills define intelligence while creativity means to develop fresh and unique ideas. The ability to think logically and adapt shown in intelligence differs from creative attributes which manifest through divergent thinking and unexpected problem-solving methods. The investigators focus on understanding the intricate relationship between intelligence and creativity during educational activities and social situations. The paper analyzes how three crucial theories proposed by Gardner, Guilford and Sternberg depict different views about the connection between intelligence and creativity. Different scientific opinions exist regarding the relationship between cognitive ability and creativity because some researchers claim that intelligence stimulates creativity yet others maintain that creativity operates independently from intelligence. The article uses longitudinal research data and theoretical investigations to show how intelligence connects with creativity among schoolchildren and adult test subjects. High intellectual ability proves not necessary for creativity since creative abilities appear across multiple intellectual levels. The development of creativity strongly depends on intrinsic motivation in combination with how education is practiced and the social environment students experience. Modern society requires personal and professional development which stems from establishing both intelligence and creativity by using flexible educational systems supported by nurturing environments. The findings show that educating students by combining intelligence and creativity maximizes the potential of human achievement according to research.
References
E. P. Torrance, Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Lexington: Ginn & Co., 1966.
N. Sydorenko, V. Denysenko, I. Grytsenko, N. Borysenko, and L. Terletska, “Methodological foundations for the formation of professional qualities in primary school teachers,” Rev. Eduweb, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2023.
R. J. Sternberg, Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
R. J. Sternberg, Successful Intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
J. J. Smolicz and E. E. Nunan, “The philosophical and sociological foundations of science education: The demythologizing of school science,” 1975.
P. Simonov, Intelligence and thinking. Moscow: Nauka, 2003.
J. S. Renzulli, “What Makes Giftedness? A Re-examination of the three-Ring Conception of Giftedness,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 134–137, 1978.
P. NO, “Methodological approach‒as an important basis of the comparativist approach in primary education.”
N. Kokhanova, “Foreign Language Teaching in Polish Primary Schools: Content-Methodological Foundations,” Top. ISSUES Hist. Educ. Comp. Educ., vol. 57.
J. P. Guilford, Creativity and its development. New York: Harper, 1967.
H. Gardner, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., pp. 91–101, 2000.
J. Burušić, T. Babarović, and M. Š. Velić, School effectiveness: An overview of conceptual, methodological and empirical foundations. 2016.
S. Z. Ashirbekovna, M. Kulakhmet, A. A. Aizhumashevna, T. Bolatbek, O. L. Muratbekovna, and A. U. Borashkyzy, “Scientific Methodological Basis of Teaching Primary School Pupils Language by Developing Speaking Activities,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1825–1837, 2022.
T. Amabile, The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983.
