The Impact of Context-Based Methods on Reading Proficiency in ESL Education
Keywords:
Types of foreign language learning in upper grades of the basic level, goals and objectives of teaching, “Learning loop” technology, development of a methodology for teaching different types of English language learningAbstract
The state standard of secondary (complete) general education in a foreign language states that a graduate should be able to read literature in the foreign language being studied using various reading strategies, that is, have the skills of access, study and review/search. "Such types of reading, as many studies show, allow solving almost all the problems of access to printed sources associated with the communicative, cognitive and aesthetic needs of a person" [203, p. 31].
References
Adams MJ (1998). The three-cueing system. In Osborn J & Lehr F (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 73–99). New York, NY: Guilford. [Google Scholar]
Anderson KL (2009). The effects of professional development on early reading skills: A comparison of two approaches (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ATT 3365837)
Anderson KL (2019). Explicit instruction for word solving: Scaffolding developing readers’ use of code-based and meaning-based strategies. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 63(2), 175–183. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2018.1542585
Anderson KL, Gelzheiser L, & Scanlon DM (2007). Strategic Reading Inventory–primary. Unpublished instrument.
Bear DR, Invernizzi M, Templeton S, & Johnston F (2004). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [
Castles A, Rastle K, & Nation K (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi: 10.1177/1529100618772271 [DOI]
Clay MM (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22(2), 155–173.
Clay MM (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development. Chicago, IL: Heinemann.
Ehri LC (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
Ehri LC (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
Foorman B, Beyler N, Borradaile K, Coyne M, Denton CA, Dimino J, … Wissel S (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016–4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Fountas IC, & Pinnell GS (2007). Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System–1: Grades K–2, levels A–N. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Gelzheiser LM, Hallgren-Flynn L, Connors M, & Scanlon DM (2014). Reading thematically related texts to develop knowledge and comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 68(1), 53–63. doi: 10.1002/trtr.1271
Gelzheiser LM, Scanlon DM, Hallgren-Flynn L, & Connors M (2019). Comprehensive reading intervention in grades 3–8: Fostering word learning, comprehension, and motivation. New York, NY:
Gelzheiser LM, Scanlon DM, Vellutino FR, Deane G, & Wang S (2020). Effects of the Interactive Strategies Approach–extended on the reading achievement of intermediate-grade struggling readers with limited reading accuracy. Manuscript in preparation
