Design of an Environmentally Sustainable Building Using Eco-Friendly Materials: a Review
Keywords:
Sustainability, Sustainable Buildings, InnovationsAbstract
Environmental sustainability has become a central concern in modern architecture and construction. This review paper explores the design of environmentally sustainable buildings, emphasizing the use of eco-friendly materials. The paper examines the properties, benefits, and challenges associated with various sustainable materials, as well as their contribution to energy efficiency, reduced carbon footprint, and overall environmental impact. Additionally, the paper discusses current trends, innovations, and future directions in sustainable building design. This review focuses on the design of environmentally sustainable buildings using eco-friendly materials, aiming to address the growing global need for reducing the environmental impact of construction. Sustainable architecture plays a critical role in mitigating climate change, minimizing waste, and conserving natural resources. The paper examines key concepts in sustainable building design, including energy efficiency, resource conservation, and waste reduction. Various eco-friendly materials, such as recycled steel, bamboo, reclaimed wood, and natural insulation materials, are evaluated for their environmental benefits, performance, and suitability for different climatic conditions. By providing a comprehensive overview of current strategies and materials used in eco-friendly building design, this review seeks to inform architects, engineers, and policymakers on how to incorporate sustainable practices into the built environment. The findings underscore the importance of adopting holistic, long-term approaches to construction that align with global sustainability goals
References
Abera, Y. A. (2024). Sustainable building materials: A comprehensive study on eco-friendly alternatives for construction. Composites and Advanced Materials, 33
Allen, J. G., & MacNaughton, P. (2017). "Indoor environmental quality and occupant health: A critical review of the literature." Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(9), 123-132.
Azari, R., & Abbasabadi, N. (2018). "Embodied energy of buildings: A review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends." Energy and Buildings, 173, 53-65.
Baetens, R., Jelle, B. P., & Gustavsen, A. (2010). "Aerogel insulation for building applications: A state-of-the-art review." Energy and Buildings, 43(4), 761-769.
Buchanan, A. H., & Honey, B. G. (1994). "Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction." Energy and Buildings, 20(3), 205-217.
Cabeza, L. F., Castell, A., Barreneche, C., de Gracia, A., & Fernández, A. I. (2011). "Materials used as PCM in thermal energy storage in buildings: A review." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3), 1675-1695.
Ghavami, K. (2005). "Bamboo as reinforcement in structural concrete elements." Cement and Concrete Composites, 27(6), 637-649.
Gleick, P. H. (2003). "Water use." Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 275-314.
Guggemos, A. A., & Horvath, A. (2005). "Comparison of environmental effects of steel-and concrete-framed buildings." Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11(2), 93-101.
Jaquin, P. A., Augarde, C. E., Gallipoli, D., & Toll, D. G. (2009). "The mechanical properties of humidified compacted earth." Géotechnique, 59(5), 415-421.
Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons.
Nguyen, K. A., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Colton, D. M. (2014). "Decision analysis for new construction of green buildings." IEEE Engineering Management Review, 42(2), 47-55.
Omer, A. M. (2008). "Energy, environment and sustainable development." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9), 2265-2300.
Retzlaff, R. C. (2009). "Green buildings and building assessment systems: A new area of interest for planners." Journal of Planning Literature, 24(1), 3-21.
Walker, R., Pavía, S., & Mitchell, R. (2014). "Mechanical properties and durability of hemp-lime concretes." Construction and Building Materials, 61, 340-348. Brown, E. R., & Manglorkar, H. (1993). Evaluation of stone matrix asphalt (SMA) for airfield pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1417, 1-10.
Mallick, R. B., & Brown, E. R. (1994). SMA mixtures for pavement construction. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 6(3), 362-367.
Muthen, K. M. (1999). Stone mastic asphalt in South Africa. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 41(3), 15-20.
Kandhal, P. S., & Mallick, R. B. (1999). Design of stone matrix asphalt mixtures for rut-resistant pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 125(1), 55-63.
Airey, G. D. (2002). Rheological evaluation of ethylene vinyl acetate polymer modified bitumens. Construction and Building Materials, 16(8), 473-487.
Sukhwani, R., & Mohan, S. (2007). Comparative study of stone matrix asphalt mixes with modified bitumen and conventional mixes. Construction and Building Materials, 21(5), 1142-1149.
Tayfur, S., Ozen, H., & Aksoy, A. (2007). Investigation of rutting performance of asphalt mixtures containing polymer modifiers. Construction and Building Materials, 21(2), 328-337.
Xiao, F., & Amirkhanian, S. N. (2009). Laboratory investigation of moisture damage in rubberized asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Construction and Building Materials, 23(5), 2046-2052.
Zhou, H., & Scullion, T. (2010). The effects of recycled materials on performance of stone matrix asphalt (SMA) mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22(7), 714-723.
Tarefder, R. A., & Zaman, M. M. (2010). A comparative study of laboratory aging effects on asphalt mixes containing different binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22(7), 728-737.
